LIVE
PNB Promotion Policy 2026-27: Clerk to Officer and Scale I to V — Eligibility, Marks Split and Exam Pattern · Bank Promotion Chart: Clerk to Scale VIII — Years, Pay Scales and How Promotions Work in PSBs (2026) · Bank of India Clerk to Officer Promotion 2026 — 813 GBO Posts, Marks Scheme, Cut-off & Merit List · Scale II to Scale III Promotion Exam MCQs — 50 Questions with Answers (2026) · Clerk to Scale I Promotion Exam MCQs — 50 Questions with Answers (2026) · IBPS RRB 2026 — 13,745 Vacancies for Office Assistant & Officer Posts: Dates, Eligibility, Pattern · Bankers' Books Evidence Act 2026 — What Changes for Bank Employees and Customers · CAIIB BRBL Key Sections & Numbers Cheat Sheet 2026 — SARFAESI, NI Act & KYC/AML on One Page · Bank Strike September–October 2026 — UFBU's 3-Phase Action Over 5-Day Banking, PLI & Pension · IBPS Clerk 2026 (CRP CSA-XVI) — 11,403 Vacancies, Apply Online by 21 August · PNB Promotion Policy 2026-27: Clerk to Officer and Scale I to V — Eligibility, Marks Split and Exam Pattern · Bank Promotion Chart: Clerk to Scale VIII — Years, Pay Scales and How Promotions Work in PSBs (2026) · Bank of India Clerk to Officer Promotion 2026 — 813 GBO Posts, Marks Scheme, Cut-off & Merit List · Scale II to Scale III Promotion Exam MCQs — 50 Questions with Answers (2026) · Clerk to Scale I Promotion Exam MCQs — 50 Questions with Answers (2026) · IBPS RRB 2026 — 13,745 Vacancies for Office Assistant & Officer Posts: Dates, Eligibility, Pattern · Bankers' Books Evidence Act 2026 — What Changes for Bank Employees and Customers · CAIIB BRBL Key Sections & Numbers Cheat Sheet 2026 — SARFAESI, NI Act & KYC/AML on One Page · Bank Strike September–October 2026 — UFBU's 3-Phase Action Over 5-Day Banking, PLI & Pension · IBPS Clerk 2026 (CRP CSA-XVI) — 11,403 Vacancies, Apply Online by 21 August ·

Scale II to Scale III Promotion Exam MCQs — 50 Questions with Answers (2026)

Last updated by Jai on October 6, 2026

Fifty practice questions for the Scale II to Scale III (MMGS-II to MMGS-III) promotion exam in public sector banks, with answers and explanations. They come from the chapters of our Scale II → III course and are pitched at the level the exam expects from a branch head or a senior manager: credit appraisal and working-capital numbers, banking law, capital and supervision, vigilance, deposits, digital banking rules and foreign exchange.

Many questions are short case studies rather than one-line facts, which is how the Scale III paper tends to test. Attempt each one before opening Show answer, and keep score. The answer keys are spread evenly across A, B, C and D.

Advances & Credit Management — Questions 1–13

Q1. In a Masala Bond (Rupee Denominated Bond issued overseas), who bears the currency (forex) risk?

A) The RBI — it acts as the guarantor of the exchange rate for Masala Bonds
B) The Indian issuer — they must repay in foreign currency which fluctuates against the rupee
C) The overseas investor/lender bears the currency risk since the bond is INR-denominated
D) Both parties share it equally — 50% each
Show answer

Answer: C) The overseas investor/lender bears the currency risk since the bond is INR-denominated

A Masala Bond is a rupee-denominated bond issued overseas. The investor converts dollars (or another currency) into rupees to subscribe and is repaid in rupees, so if the rupee weakens by maturity the investor gets back fewer dollars. The Indian issuer borrows and repays in rupees and carries no currency risk. That is the reverse of a foreign-currency ECB, where the Indian borrower bears the exchange risk.

Q2. In the DSCR (Debt Service Coverage Ratio) formula, why is Depreciation added back in the numerator?

A) Depreciation is a non-cash charge — it reduces reported profit but involves no actual cash outflow
B) Depreciation is added back only for manufacturing companies, not for service companies
C) Depreciation is a tax deductible expense — adding it back gives the pre-tax profit figure
D) Depreciation must be set aside for asset replacement — adding it back adjusts for this future capital expenditure
Show answer

Answer: A) Depreciation is a non-cash charge — it reduces reported profit but involves no actual cash outflow

DSCR measures the cash available to service a term loan. Depreciation reduces reported profit but involves no cash payment, so it is added back to convert accounting profit into a cash-flow figure, as in a cash-flow statement.

Q3. The standard asset provisioning rate for advances to Commercial Real Estate (CRE) is:

A) 1.00%
B) 0.75%
C) 0.40%
D) 0.25%
Show answer

Answer: A) 1.00%

Under RBI’s current IRAC norms, standard advances to Commercial Real Estate carry a 1.00% provision, higher than the 0.40% for general standard advances, because of the sector’s cyclicality. For comparison: CRE–Residential Housing is 0.75%, and direct agricultural and SME advances are 0.25%.

Q4. A borrower wants a home loan of ₹55 lakh against a property valued at ₹70 lakh. What is the maximum LTV permissible under RBI guidelines for this loan?

A) 70% (conservative default for under-construction properties)
B) 80% (loan amount falls in the ₹30 lakh to ₹75 lakh tier)
C) 75% (applicable for all home loans above ₹30 lakh)
D) 90% (since the loan amount is below ₹75 lakh)
Show answer

Answer: B) 80% (loan amount falls in the ₹30 lakh to ₹75 lakh tier)

RBI’s LTV caps for housing loans depend on the loan amount: up to ₹30 lakh, 90%; above ₹30 lakh and up to ₹75 lakh, 80%; above ₹75 lakh, 75%. A ₹55 lakh loan falls in the middle tier, so the cap is 80%. Here the LTV is 55 ÷ 70 = 78.6%, which is within the cap.

Q5. Under PM Vishwakarma Scheme, the maximum credit available to a traditional artisan (across Tier I and Tier II) is:

A) ₹5 lakh at market interest rate (no concessional element)
B) ₹1 lakh at 5% interest (Tier I only; Tier II is not for credit)
C) ₹2 lakh at 5% interest
D) ₹3 lakh (₹1 lakh Tier I + ₹2 lakh Tier II), at 5% interest
Show answer

Answer: D) ₹3 lakh (₹1 lakh Tier I + ₹2 lakh Tier II), at 5% interest

PM Vishwakarma gives collateral-free credit in two tranches at a concessional 5% interest rate: ₹1 lakh in the first tranche and ₹2 lakh in the second, which opens after the first is repaid satisfactorily. The maximum is therefore ₹3 lakh. The Government of India bears the interest subvention.

Q6. A bank lends ₹80 lakh against pledge of listed shares. The bank subsequently needs funds urgently and sub-pledges the same shares to another institution (sub-pawnee) for a loan of ₹95 lakh. The sub-pawnee later sells the shares for ₹1 crore. Is the bank’s sub-pledge valid and what are the consequences?

A) Invalid — a pawnee can never sub-pledge pledged goods under any circumstances, regardless of the amount involved
B) Fully valid — a pawnee can sub-pledge for any amount without restriction
C) Partially valid — valid only up to the original ₹80 lakh debt
D) Fully invalid — the sub-pledge is void and the sub-pawnee gets nothing
Show answer

Answer: C) Partially valid — valid only up to the original ₹80 lakh debt

Under Section 179 of the Indian Contract Act, a person with only a limited interest in goods can pledge them only to the extent of that interest. The bank’s interest in the shares is its ₹80 lakh debt, so the sub-pledge is valid up to ₹80 lakh. The sub-pawnee can hold the shares as security for ₹80 lakh only; the remaining ₹15 lakh it lent is an unsecured claim against the bank. Out of the ₹1 crore sale proceeds, the surplus above the ₹80 lakh debt belongs to the original pledgor.

Q7. A bank wants to securitise a pool of home loans. The original maturity of the home loans is 20 years. What is the Minimum Holding Period (MHP) the bank must satisfy before securitising these loans?

A) 3 months after loan disbursement
B) 3 months after repayment commencement date
C) 12 months after loan disbursement
D) 6 months after repayment commencement date
Show answer

Answer: D) 6 months after repayment commencement date

Under RBI’s Master Direction on Securitisation of Standard Assets (2021), the Minimum Holding Period runs from the date of the first repayment, not from disbursement. It is 3 months for loans with a tenor of up to 2 years and 6 months for loans with a tenor above 2 years. A 20-year home loan therefore needs 6 months after repayment starts.

Q8. Compute the DSCR for Year 3 of a project from the following data: Net Profit After Tax = ₹200 lakh; Depreciation = ₹60 lakh; Interest on Term Loan = ₹120 lakh; Term Loan Principal Repayment = ₹80 lakh; Interest on Working Capital = ₹40 lakh. Is this DSCR acceptable to a bank?

A) DSCR = 2.00; acceptable (strongly above 1.25)
B) DSCR = 1.90; acceptable (comfortably above 1.25)
C) DSCR = 1.50; acceptable (above 1.25 minimum)
D) DSCR = 1.10; not acceptable (below 1.25 minimum)
Show answer

Answer: B) DSCR = 1.90; acceptable (comfortably above 1.25)

Numerator = PAT + depreciation + interest on term loan = 200 + 60 + 120 = ₹380 lakh. Denominator = interest on term loan + principal repayment = 120 + 80 = ₹200 lakh. DSCR = 380 ÷ 200 = 1.90, comfortably above the usual 1.25 benchmark. Working-capital interest is left out of both sides; DSCR covers term-debt service only.

Q9. Under Tandon Committee Method II, a borrower has Current Assets of ₹1,50,00,000 and Current Liabilities (other than bank borrowings) of ₹45,00,000. What is the MPBF?

A) ₹60,00,000
B) ₹67,50,000
C) ₹75,00,000
D) ₹82,50,000
Show answer

Answer: B) ₹67,50,000

Method II: MPBF = 75% of Current Assets − Current Liabilities other than bank borrowings = (75% × 1,50,00,000) − 45,00,000 = 1,12,50,000 − 45,00,000 = ₹67,50,000. The borrower funds 25% of current assets from long-term sources.

Q10. A bank with total advances of ₹5,000 crore has met its overall PSL target of 40% but has a shortfall of ₹200 crore in the Agriculture sub-target. The shortfall amount must be deposited with:

A) SIDBI at the prevailing MCLR-linked rate for MSME shortfall
B) State Bank of India as the lead PSL bank at a discounted rate
C) RBI Reverse Repo window at the prevailing repo rate
D) NABARD’s Rural Infrastructure Development Fund (RIDF)
Show answer

Answer: D) NABARD’s Rural Infrastructure Development Fund (RIDF)

Banks that miss a priority-sector target or sub-target are allotted the shortfall for deposit in NABARD’s Rural Infrastructure Development Fund (RIDF) and similar funds, at interest rates below what the money could earn if lent. NABARD uses RIDF to fund rural infrastructure through state governments. The below-market return is the effective penalty for the shortfall.

Q11. An investor buys 100 grams of Sovereign Gold Bonds at ₹6,200/gram (total ₹6.2 lakh). The bond carries interest at 2.5% a year, paid half-yearly, over its 8-year tenure. What is the annual interest income, and how is it taxed?

A) ₹7,750/year (the interest is 2.5% of current gold market price, which may be different from the initial price)
B) ₹15,500/year; taxable at a flat 10% (the LTCG rate for bonds)
C) ₹15,500/year (2.5% of ₹6.2 lakh); taxable as Income from Other Sources at slab rate
D) ₹15,500/year (2.5% of ₹6.2 lakh); FULLY EXEMPT from income tax since SGB is a government security
Show answer

Answer: C) ₹15,500/year (2.5% of ₹6.2 lakh); taxable as Income from Other Sources at slab rate

SGB interest is 2.5% a year on the initial issue price, not on the current gold price: 2.5% × ₹6.2 lakh = ₹15,500 a year, paid half-yearly. The interest is taxable as Income from Other Sources at the investor’s slab rate. The tax exemption applies to the capital gain when an individual redeems the bond at maturity, not to the interest.

Q12. A MSME manufacturing company (₹15 crore debt) wants to use PPIRP. The promoter has prepared a base plan that proposes a 30% haircut and a 4-year repayment. Of the company’s financial creditors, lenders holding 60% of the debt agree; lenders holding 40% disagree. Can the PPIRP application be filed?

A) No — filing needs approval from unrelated financial creditors holding at least 66% of the financial debt
B) Yes — any single creditor or the corporate debtor can file for PPIRP regardless of creditor consent
C) No — PPIRP requires 100% creditor consent for the base plan
D) Yes — 60% support is sufficient since the ICA majority threshold (75% by value) does not apply to PPIRP
Show answer

Answer: A) No — filing needs approval from unrelated financial creditors holding at least 66% of the financial debt

Under Section 54A of the IBC, a corporate debtor (an MSME) can file for PPIRP only after financial creditors who are not its related parties, holding at least 66% in value of the financial debt, approve the filing and propose the resolution professional. With only 60% in favour, the threshold is not met and the application cannot be filed yet.

Q13. A project has Fixed Costs of ₹60 lakh per year, a Selling Price of ₹500 per unit, and Variable Cost of ₹350 per unit. The project assumes annual production and sales of 60,000 units. At what capacity utilisation level does the project break even, and what is the Margin of Safety?

A) BEP = 30,000 units (50% of capacity); Margin of Safety = 50%
B) BEP = 40,000 units (67% of capacity); Margin of Safety = 33%
C) BEP = 50,000 units (83% of capacity); Margin of Safety = 17%
D) BEP = 60,000 units (100% of capacity); Margin of Safety = 0%
Show answer

Answer: B) BEP = 40,000 units (67% of capacity); Margin of Safety = 33%

Contribution per unit = 500 − 350 = ₹150. BEP = fixed costs ÷ contribution = 60,00,000 ÷ 150 = 40,000 units, which is 40,000 ÷ 60,000 = 67% of the assumed level. Margin of Safety = (60,000 − 40,000) ÷ 60,000 = 33%, meaning sales can fall by a third before the project makes a loss.

Banking Law — Questions 14–24

Q14. Under Section 10A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, what is the minimum percentage of Board directors that must have special knowledge or practical experience in fields like banking, finance, economics, or law?

A) 25%
B) 33%
C) 51%
D) 75%
Show answer

Answer: C) 51%

Section 10A of the Banking Regulation Act requires at least 51% of the board to have special knowledge or practical experience in fields such as accountancy, agriculture, banking, economics, finance, law or small-scale industry.

Q15. A bill is drawn in Chennai on a Hyderabad bank, payable to a Mumbai company. Which category does it belong to under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881?

A) Inland bill — drawn in India, on an India-resident, and payable in India
B) Foreign bill — because three different cities are involved
C) Ambiguous instrument — because the payee is in a different city from the drawer
D) Foreign bill — because the drawee is a bank
Show answer

Answer: A) Inland bill — drawn in India, on an India-resident, and payable in India

Section 11 of the NI Act: a bill is inland if it is drawn or made in India and is payable in, or drawn on a person resident in, India. All of that holds here. The fact that three Indian cities are involved does not matter.

Q16. Under Section 171 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, a bank’s general lien extends to:

A) Only the specific securities deposited as collateral for a particular loan, unless the customer separately signs a general lien agreement with the bank
B) Only goods on which the bank has exercised skill or labour
C) Securities deposited after the default date only
D) Any goods or securities deposited by the customer in the course of banking business, as security for the general balance of the account
Show answer

Answer: D) Any goods or securities deposited by the customer in the course of banking business, as security for the general balance of the account

Section 171 gives bankers a general lien: they may retain any goods or securities bailed to them as security for the general balance of account, not only for a specific loan, unless there is an express contract to the contrary.

Q17. According to Clayton’s Case (Devaynes v Noble, 1816), how are payments/credits in a running current account appropriated against outstanding debits?

A) The most recent debit is paid off first — last in, first out
B) The largest debit is paid off first, regardless of when it was incurred
C) The customer can specify which debit each credit should be applied against
D) The first debit (oldest outstanding debt) is paid off first
Show answer

Answer: D) The first debit (oldest outstanding debt) is paid off first

Clayton’s Case set the first-in, first-out rule for running accounts: each credit is applied against the earliest outstanding debit, unless the parties agree otherwise. It matters for guarantors and for securities held against running accounts.

Q18. Northern Bank’s balance sheet shows ₹15 lakh of unamortised share-selling commission from its IPO five years ago, treated as an intangible asset. The bank had a profit of ₹400 crore this year and the Board wants to declare a 20% dividend. Under the BR Act, can it do so?

A) No — Section 15 requires all capitalised expenditure to be fully written off before any dividend can be declared
B) Yes — ₹15 lakh is immaterial against ₹400 crore profit; materiality exemptions apply under Section 15
C) No — dividends by banking companies always require RBI’s prior approval regardless of Section 15 compliance
D) Yes — Section 15 only prohibits dividend if the bank has made a net loss; a ₹400 crore profit means dividend is permissible
Show answer

Answer: A) No — Section 15 requires all capitalised expenditure to be fully written off before any dividend can be declared

Section 15 of the BR Act bars a banking company from paying any dividend until all its capitalised expenses — including preliminary expenses, share-selling commission, brokerage and losses — have been completely written off. There is no materiality exception, so even ₹15 lakh outstanding blocks the dividend.

Q19. In May 2023 RBI withdrew ₹2000 notes from circulation and asked the public to deposit or exchange them at banks by 30 September 2023. After that date, a shopkeeper refuses a ₹2000 note, saying it has been demonetised. Is the shopkeeper correct?

A) Yes — the withdrawal announcement made ₹2000 notes legally worthless after the deadline
B) No — withdrawal from circulation is not the same as demonetisation; no Section 26(2) notification was issued
C) No, but only if the shopkeeper is a listed business — small shops can refuse ₹2000 notes after the deadline
D) Yes — RBI’s circular to banks amounts to demonetisation even without a Gazette notification
Show answer

Answer: B) No — withdrawal from circulation is not the same as demonetisation; no Section 26(2) notification was issued

Demonetisation needs a Gazette notification under Section 26(2) of the RBI Act declaring a series of notes no longer legal tender. The ₹2000 withdrawal had no such notification, so the notes remain legal tender. Withdrawal from circulation is not demonetisation.

Q20. Arjun’s company has given a power of attorney to City Bank authorising the bank to manage and sell the mortgaged warehouse property in the event of default. Arjun’s company defaults and then attempts to revoke the PoA before the bank enforces it. Can Arjun’s company revoke the PoA?

A) Yes — but only with the bank’s written consent
B) No — but only because the PoA was registered; an unregistered PoA can always be revoked
C) No — this is an agency coupled with interest under Section 202
D) Yes — a principal can revoke a PoA at any time by giving reasonable notice
Show answer

Answer: C) No — this is an agency coupled with interest under Section 202

Section 202 of the Contract Act: where the agent has an interest in the property that forms the subject-matter of the agency, the agency cannot be terminated to the prejudice of that interest. The bank holds the power of attorney as part of its security for the loan, so the company cannot revoke it.

Q21. Priya was born on June 1, 2005. A cause of action in her favour accrued on June 1, 2018, when she was 13 years old. The applicable limitation period for this type of claim is 3 years. What is the latest date by which Priya can file the suit?

A) June 1, 2026 — 3 years after Priya attains majority on June 1, 2023, per Section 6
B) June 1, 2021 — 3 years from the date the cause of action accrued
C) June 1, 2024 — 1 year after Priya attains majority on June 1, 2023
D) June 1, 2021 — Section 6 does not apply because Priya could have sued through a guardian
Show answer

Answer: A) June 1, 2026 — 3 years after Priya attains majority on June 1, 2023, per Section 6

Priya turns 18 on 1 June 2023. Because the cause of action arose while she was a minor, Section 6 of the Limitation Act lets her sue within the same period (3 years) counted from the date her disability ends: 1 June 2023 + 3 years = 1 June 2026.

Q22. A bank’s compliance team files an STR on a corporate account after observing a sudden spike in inward remittances followed by immediate transfers to multiple shell entities. The company’s CFO later calls the bank asking if any report has been filed against the account. What is the correct response?

A) The bank may disclose that an STR was filed once the ED investigation is complete and the STR is no longer confidential
B) The bank must not disclose that an STR has been filed — the tipping-off prohibition under PMLA applies
C) The bank must disclose whether an STR was filed — the CFO has a right to know under the Right to Information Act
D) The bank may confirm or deny the STR filing if the inquiry comes from a senior officer — tipping-off restrictions only apply to branch staff
Show answer

Answer: B) The bank must not disclose that an STR has been filed — the tipping-off prohibition under PMLA applies

PMLA rules prohibit a reporting entity and its staff from disclosing to the customer or anyone else that an STR has been or is being filed (tipping off). This applies whoever is asking and at every level of the bank; the RTI Act does not override it.

Q23. A bank pays a cheque for ₹50,000. On closer examination, the amount in words says “Fifty Thousand Rupees” but the amount in figures has been altered to ₹5,00,000. The alteration was made in a different ink that would have been visible to a careful examiner. The payee has already spent the ₹5,00,000. Who bears the loss?

A) The drawer — a bank is always protected for paying a cheque if the drawer’s signature is genuine
B) The payee — as the recipient of the wrongfully paid amount, the payee must return the money
C) The bank — the alteration was apparent, and paying despite it is negligence
D) Both the bank and the drawer share the loss equally — 50/50
Show answer

Answer: C) The bank — the alteration was apparent, and paying despite it is negligence

Section 89 of the NI Act protects a paying banker only when a material alteration was not apparent. Here the alteration was visible (different ink, and the figures did not match the words), so paying it was negligent. The bank must re-credit the drawer’s account with the excess ₹4,50,000 and pursue the payee itself.

Q24. A bank receives a garnishee order nisi on Monday for a corporate borrower’s current account. On Thursday (before the garnishee is made absolute), the NCLT admits a CIRP petition against the same borrower under IBC Section 7. What happens to the garnishee order?

A) The garnishee continues but only for the amount it claimed — new execution orders are stayed
B) The garnishee proceeds as planned — CIRP admission only stays future actions, not orders already served
C) The bank can choose to comply with the garnishee order if it believes the moratorium will be challenged
D) Automatically stayed by the IBC Section 14 moratorium from the CIRP admission date
Show answer

Answer: D) Automatically stayed by the IBC Section 14 moratorium from the CIRP admission date

The Section 14 moratorium applies from the date NCLT admits the CIRP. It bars the institution or continuation of proceedings and the execution of any order against the corporate debtor. A garnishee order still at the nisi stage is a pending proceeding, so it is stayed and the bank must not pay under it.

RBI Policy, Capital & Supervision — Questions 25–31

Q25. Under the Flexible Inflation Targeting (FIT) framework introduced by the Finance Act, 2016, the MPC is deemed to have failed its mandate when:

A) WPI inflation exceeds 6% for two consecutive quarters
B) Real GDP growth falls below 5% for two consecutive quarters
C) CPI inflation is above the 4% target in any single quarter
D) CPI inflation remains outside the 2% to 6% tolerance band for three consecutive quarters (9 months)
Show answer

Answer: D) CPI inflation remains outside the 2% to 6% tolerance band for three consecutive quarters (9 months)

Under the inflation-targeting framework (RBI Act as amended in 2016, with the target notified by the Government), RBI fails its mandate if average CPI inflation stays above 6% or below 2% for three consecutive quarters. RBI must then report to the Government the reasons, the remedial action and the expected time to return to target. The target is CPI-based; WPI and GDP growth do not define failure.

Q26. What does the “M” in CAMELS stand for in the context of RBI’s supervisory assessment framework?

A) Management — the quality of governance, compliance culture, board oversight, and leadership
B) Mortgage quality — the health of the bank’s home loan portfolio
C) Monetary Policy compliance — how well the bank meets RBI’s monetary policy requirements
D) Market Risk — the risk from adverse movements in market prices
Show answer

Answer: A) Management — the quality of governance, compliance culture, board oversight, and leadership

In CAMELS, M stands for Management: the quality of governance, board oversight, compliance culture and leadership. The other letters are Capital adequacy, Asset quality, Earnings, Liquidity and Systems and controls.

Q27. “Devolvement” in the context of G-sec auctions means:

A) The transfer of G-secs between bank portfolios (HTM to AFS)
B) RBI buying back G-secs from banks through Open Market Operations
C) The unsold portion of a G-sec auction (bids insufficient at acceptable yields) is forcibly allotted to Primary Dealers at the cut-off yield
D) The downgrading of a G-sec’s credit rating by rating agencies
Show answer

Answer: C) The unsold portion of a G-sec auction (bids insufficient at acceptable yields) is forcibly allotted to Primary Dealers at the cut-off yield

Devolvement happens when a G-sec auction does not attract enough acceptable bids. The unsubscribed portion is allotted to Primary Dealers under their underwriting commitments, at the cut-off yield. PDs lose if market yields then rise above that cut-off.

Q28. The LVB compulsory merger into DBS Bank India was completed in 10 days. What legal mechanism made such speed possible?

A) IBC (Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code) — Fast Track CIRP allows 90-day resolution
B) Section 45 of the BR Act — the scheme, prepared by RBI and notified by the Central Government, binds all parties without court proceedings or shareholder approval from either bank
C) SARFAESI Act — RBI used SARFAESI enforcement to transfer LVB’s secured assets to DBS
D) Companies Act Sec 230-232 — NCLT approved the merger in an expedited 10-day process
Show answer

Answer: B) Section 45 of the BR Act — the scheme, prepared by RBI and notified by the Central Government, binds all parties without court proceedings or shareholder approval from either bank

Section 45 of the BR Act lets RBI prepare a scheme of amalgamation for a bank under moratorium, which the Central Government sanctions. The scheme binds everyone from its effective date, with no court approval or shareholder vote needed. LVB’s moratorium began on 17 November 2020 and the amalgamation took effect on 27 November 2020.

Q29. A bank submits its ICAAP report to RBI. RBI’s SREP (Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process) finds that the bank’s stress scenarios for IRRBB were based on a 50 bps interest rate shock, while RBI considers a 200 bps shock to be the appropriate stress level given current market conditions. What action can RBI take?

A) RBI can require the bank to redo its ICAAP at 200 bps and, if capital is then inadequate, mandate a Pillar 2 Capital Add-on above the Pillar 1 minimum CRAR
B) RBI waives the ICAAP requirement for banks with CRAR above 12%
C) RBI can penalise the bank ₹1 crore for each inadequate stress scenario in the ICAAP
D) RBI can only note the concern in the inspection report — it cannot override the bank’s own ICAAP methodology, since ICAAP is legally the sole prerogative of the bank’s board under Basel III
Show answer

Answer: A) RBI can require the bank to redo its ICAAP at 200 bps and, if capital is then inadequate, mandate a Pillar 2 Capital Add-on above the Pillar 1 minimum CRAR

Under Pillar 2, RBI reviews each bank’s ICAAP through its supervisory review (SREP) and can challenge it. If the stress tests are too mild, RBI can ask for them to be redone with a stiffer shock and, if that shows a shortfall, require capital above the Pillar 1 minimum as a bank-specific add-on.

Q30. A bank’s rate-sensitive assets and liabilities are matched in TOTAL volume but have very different repricing timelines (assets reprice in 5 years, liabilities in 1 year). This scenario primarily illustrates:

A) No IRRBB exposure at all, since volumes match
B) Gap risk
C) Options risk
D) Basis risk
Show answer

Answer: B) Gap risk

Gap (repricing) risk comes from timing differences in when assets and liabilities reprice or mature, even if total volumes match. Basis risk is about different benchmark rates; options risk is about embedded options such as prepayment.

Q31. A bank extends a ₹50 crore term loan to a company. The company is a subsidiary of a large conglomerate. The bank also has ₹200 crore in exposures to the parent company. The bank argues these are two separate entities and should not be aggregated for LEF. Is the bank correct?

A) Yes — connected-counterparty aggregation applies only to entities in the same country
B) No — but only if both entities have been classified as Wilful Defaulters by the bank
C) No — since the parent controls the subsidiary, they form a connected group; the bank must aggregate ₹200cr + ₹50cr = ₹250cr against the 25% Tier 1 ceiling
D) Yes — subsidiaries are separate legal entities; the parent’s exposure and subsidiary’s exposure are always independent under LEF
Show answer

Answer: C) No — since the parent controls the subsidiary, they form a connected group; the bank must aggregate ₹200cr + ₹50cr = ₹250cr against the 25% Tier 1 ceiling

Under the Large Exposures Framework, counterparties linked by control (or by economic interdependence) form a group of connected counterparties, and exposures to them are added together. The parent controls the subsidiary, so the bank’s exposure is ₹200 crore + ₹50 crore = ₹250 crore, tested against the group limit as a share of Tier 1 capital.

🎯 Scale II → III Promotion Course

Past the halfway mark. The full course has 64 chapters and 980+ MCQs with worked explanations, plus a 100-question mock test, mapped to the Scale II → III syllabus.

See the Scale II → III course →

Frauds & Vigilance — Questions 32–34

Q32. The Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) derives its statutory status from which legislation, and in which year?

A) Right to Information Act, 2005
B) Banking Regulation Act, 1949
C) Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
D) CVC Act, 2003
Show answer

Answer: D) CVC Act, 2003

The CVC was first set up in 1964 by executive resolution and became a statutory body under the Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003. The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 defines the offences; it is not the CVC’s founding law.

Q33. The “Agreed List” and the “List of Officers of Doubtful Integrity (ODI list)” are both examples of:

A) Public disclosures published on the bank’s website
B) Preventive tools, monitoring postings without a proven case
C) Punitive vigilance, applied only after a proven case
D) Lists maintained solely by the CBI, with no bank involvement
Show answer

Answer: B) Preventive tools, monitoring postings without a proven case

Both are preventive-vigilance tools. They work on suspicion and risk — for example, keeping officers off sensitive postings — without needing a proven case, unlike the disciplinary route with first- and second-stage advice.

Q34. The Supreme Court’s ruling in State Bank of India v Rajesh Agarwal (2023), later codified in the 2024 Master Directions, established that:

A) Banks may classify a borrower as fraud without a hearing if the amount exceeds ₹1 crore
B) Fraud classification requires a criminal court conviction first
C) Only RBI, not the bank, can classify a borrower as fraud
D) Audi alteram partem applies — a borrower must get a hearing before fraud classification
Show answer

Answer: D) Audi alteram partem applies — a borrower must get a hearing before fraud classification

In SBI v Rajesh Agarwal (March 2023), the Supreme Court held that the principles of natural justice apply: a borrower must be given notice and a chance to respond before the account is classified as fraud. RBI’s 2024 Master Directions on Fraud Risk Management build this hearing into the process.

Deposits & Customer Service — Questions 35–39

Q35. An NRI earns ₹3 lakh per month as rent from her Mumbai apartment. In which account must this rental income be credited?

A) NRO account — rental income is “Indian source income” and must go to NRO, not NRE
B) Resident savings account — NRIs receiving Indian income are treated as residents for that income
C) NRE account — any income can be credited to an NRE account
D) FCNR(B) account — rental income in INR can be converted to foreign currency and deposited
Show answer

Answer: A) NRO account — rental income is “Indian source income” and must go to NRO, not NRE

Income that arises in India — rent, dividends, pension, interest — must be credited to an NRO account. An NRE account takes only funds remitted from abroad or earned outside India. Current income in an NRO account, such as rent, can be repatriated after tax.

Q36. After the DICGC Amendment Act 2021, when a bank is placed under moratorium, DICGC must pay insured depositors within:

A) 1 year of the moratorium order
B) Only after the bank is formally liquidated — the 2021 amendment did not change the payout timing
C) 90 days of the moratorium order — even while the bank is still in moratorium (not yet wound up)
D) 30 days of the moratorium order
Show answer

Answer: C) 90 days of the moratorium order — even while the bank is still in moratorium (not yet wound up)

Since the DICGC (Amendment) Act, 2021, when RBI places restrictions (a moratorium) on an insured bank, DICGC must pay each depositor up to ₹5 lakh within 90 days, without waiting for liquidation. The bank has 45 days to submit depositor claims and DICGC has the next 45 days to verify and pay.

Q37. An NRI (resident in the UK) has an NRO account with ₹10 lakh of interest income in a financial year. The bank deducts TDS at 30% (₹3 lakh). The India-UK DTAA specifies a 15% maximum tax rate on interest income for UK residents. What should the NRI do to recover the excess TDS?

A) The NRI claims the excess TDS refund directly from the AD bank without filing any return
B) DTAA rates apply only to NRE accounts, not NRO accounts
C) Submit Form 10F and a Tax Residency Certificate to the bank before TDS is deducted, so the bank applies the 15% DTAA rate instead of 30%
D) The NRI cannot recover any excess TDS at all under any circumstances — 30% is the statutory rate and DTAA relief never applies to NRO interest
Show answer

Answer: C) Submit Form 10F and a Tax Residency Certificate to the bank before TDS is deducted, so the bank applies the 15% DTAA rate instead of 30%

DTAA rates apply to NRO interest. If the NRI gives the bank a Tax Residency Certificate from the UK and Form 10F before the interest is credited, the bank can deduct TDS at the treaty rate of 15% instead of 30%. If tax has already been deducted at the higher rate, the NRI must file an Indian income-tax return to claim the excess (₹1.5 lakh here) as a refund.

Q38. Bank X merges with Bank Y (under a normal voluntary merger, not a distress Sec 45 merger). A depositor has ₹4 lakh at Bank X (pre-merger) and ₹3 lakh at Bank Y (pre-merger). After the merger, both accounts are at Bank Y. What is the DICGC coverage position?

A) ₹3 lakh insured (only the acquiring bank’s deposits — Bank Y deposits — are insured)
B) ₹4 lakh insured (only the Bank X deposits are insured at the new merged bank)
C) ₹7 lakh insured — all pre-merger deposits retain fully separate DICGC coverage even after the merger legally takes effect, per RBI’s merger guidelines
D) ₹5 lakh insured — post-merger, both deposits combine at Bank Y; the ₹5 lakh limit applies to the combined ₹7 lakh, assessed as of the merger date
Show answer

Answer: D) ₹5 lakh insured — post-merger, both deposits combine at Bank Y; the ₹5 lakh limit applies to the combined ₹7 lakh, assessed as of the merger date

After a merger, Bank X’s depositors become depositors of Bank Y, and DICGC cover applies per depositor per bank, in the same right and capacity. The combined ₹7 lakh is now held in one bank, so only ₹5 lakh is insured and ₹2 lakh is not. Depositors with balances in both merging banks should review their exposure.

Q39. A contractor issued an “on-demand” Bank Guarantee of ₹2 crore to a government department for a contract. The government invokes the BG. The contractor approaches a court seeking an injunction to prevent the bank from paying, arguing the government breached the contract first. Will a court typically grant this injunction?

A) Yes — the contractor’s argument that the government itself breached the contract is a valid defence
B) No — courts do not stop payment merely because of a contract dispute; only established fraud or irretrievable injustice qualifies
C) Yes — if the contractor can show any dispute with the government, the BG is stayed
D) Yes — Indian courts routinely and readily grant injunctions whenever a contractor disputes the beneficiary’s invocation of an on-demand bank guarantee it had issued earlier
Show answer

Answer: B) No — courts do not stop payment merely because of a contract dispute; only established fraud or irretrievable injustice qualifies

An on-demand bank guarantee is independent of the underlying contract. The Supreme Court (for example in U.P. Cooperative Federation v Singh Consultants) has held that courts should not restrain its encashment because of a contractual dispute. The only exceptions are an established fraud of an egregious nature or irretrievable injustice. The contractor’s remedy is to claim damages from the beneficiary later.

Digital Banking — Questions 40–43

Q40. Under RBI’s Digital Lending Directions, 2025, who is the legal counterparty (lender) in a digital loan facilitated through a fintech app that partners with an NBFC?

A) The NBFC (Regulated Entity) — it is the lender; the fintech app is only a Lending Service Provider
B) The fintech app (LSP) — since it sources the customer and processes the loan application
C) Both the fintech and the NBFC jointly — co-lenders share equal responsibility
D) RBI itself — RBI guarantees all digital loans
Show answer

Answer: A) The NBFC (Regulated Entity) — it is the lender; the fintech app is only a Lending Service Provider

In digital lending, the Regulated Entity (here the NBFC) is the lender: the loan is on its books, it bears the credit risk, and it is responsible for KYC, the Key Fact Statement and grievance redressal. The Lending Service Provider (the app) sources customers and provides technology but does not lend.

Q41. A borrower took a ₹1 lakh personal loan through a digital app (LSP of Bank Apex). He missed his 3rd EMI. Bank Apex’s penal charge policy: “2% per month additional interest on overdue amount.” Is this policy compliant with RBI’s August 2023 Penal Charges circular?

A) No — since 2024, lenders cannot levy penal interest added to the rate; a default can only attract a reasonable ‘penal charge’ that is not capitalised
B) Yes — penal interest at any rate is permissible as long as it is disclosed in the KFS
C) No — the digital lending rules ban every kind of charge for late payment
D) Yes — 2% per month penal interest is a standard market practice and compliant
Show answer

Answer: A) No — since 2024, lenders cannot levy penal interest added to the rate; a default can only attract a reasonable ‘penal charge’ that is not capitalised

RBI’s Fair Lending Practice – Penal Charges in Loan Accounts circular (18 August 2023, in force from 1 January 2024) bars penal interest — an extra rate added to the interest charged. A default may attract only a ‘penal charge’ that is reasonable, disclosed in the loan agreement and KFS, and not capitalised (no further interest on it). A flat 2% per month on the overdue amount is penal interest, so the policy does not comply.

Q42. An e-commerce merchant stores customer card numbers in an AES-256 encrypted format, claiming this satisfies RBI’s Card-on-File Tokenisation requirement since the data is “secure.” Is this correct?

A) Yes — for merchants with less than ₹10 crore annual turnover, encrypted storage is an acceptable alternative to tokenisation
B) Partially correct — AES-256 encryption is acceptable if the key is stored separately from the encrypted data
C) No — RBI’s mandate requires replacing the PAN with a token; encrypted PAN is still PAN in disguise
D) Yes — AES-256 encryption is sufficiently strong to comply with RBI’s tokenisation mandate
Show answer

Answer: C) No — RBI’s mandate requires replacing the PAN with a token; encrypted PAN is still PAN in disguise

RBI’s card-on-file rules bar merchants from storing card data at all; encrypted card numbers are still card data. Card-on-file transactions must use tokens issued through a card network or issuer token service, which cannot be reversed to the card number without the token vault.

Q43. A bank’s annual BCP/DR test reveals: the failover to the DRC took 6 hours; the core banking system was restored but some transaction data from the previous 4 hours was lost. The bank’s BCP specifies RTO = 4 hours and RPO = 1 hour. What are the BCP non-compliances?

A) Only the RPO breach (4 hours of data loss) is a non-compliance — the 6-hour RTO is still acceptable
B) TWO non-compliances: RTO breach (6h vs 4h) and RPO breach (4h lost vs 1h)
C) Only the RTO breach is a non-compliance — data loss of 4 hours is within acceptable range for DR scenarios
D) No non-compliance — the test revealed issues; remediation can begin
Show answer

Answer: B) TWO non-compliances: RTO breach (6h vs 4h) and RPO breach (4h lost vs 1h)

RTO is the maximum acceptable time to restore service; RPO is the maximum acceptable data loss, measured in time. Recovery took 6 hours against an RTO of 4, and 4 hours of data were lost against an RPO of 1, so both targets were breached. Both need root-cause analysis, board reporting and a remediation plan.

Foreign Exchange & Trade Finance — Questions 44–50

Q44. ISBP 821 is best described as:

A) An RBI circular governing import LC limits for Indian banks
B) A replacement for UCP 600 — the latest ICC publication superseding the older rules
C) A SWIFT messaging standard for LC transactions
D) A companion to UCP 600 with guidance on examining LC documents
Show answer

Answer: D) A companion to UCP 600 with guidance on examining LC documents

ISBP 821 (International Standard Banking Practice) is an ICC publication that works alongside UCP 600, not instead of it. UCP 600 sets the rules; ISBP 821 explains how banks should examine specific documents — invoices, transport documents, insurance, certificates — in practice.

Q45. Under the FEMA (ODI) Rules 2022, what is the maximum total financial commitment an Indian company can make overseas under the automatic route, in terms of its net worth?

A) 100% of net worth
B) 200% of net worth
C) 400% of net worth
D) 600% of net worth
Show answer

Answer: C) 400% of net worth

Under the FEMA (Overseas Investment) Rules, 2022, an Indian entity’s total financial commitment abroad — equity, debt and guarantees — may go up to 400% of its net worth (per the last audited balance sheet) under the automatic route. Beyond that, RBI approval is required.

Q46. What was the primary reason the Tarapore Committee’s 1997 recommendation for full Capital Account Convertibility (CAC) was NOT implemented?

A) The RBI Governor at the time opposed CAC implementation
B) India’s inflation was already above the 3-5% target range
C) The Indian Parliament rejected the recommendation
D) The Asian financial crisis erupted in 1997-98
Show answer

Answer: D) The Asian financial crisis erupted in 1997-98

The Tarapore Committee (1997) proposed a phased move to full capital account convertibility subject to preconditions on the fiscal deficit, inflation and banking-sector NPAs. The Asian financial crisis of 1997–98, with sudden capital flight from several open East Asian economies, made the case for caution and the plan was shelved.

Q47. An export bill for USD 100,000 was due for payment on 1 June 2025. The buyer failed to pay. By what date must the bank crystallise the bill, and what will be the INR impact?

A) Bank must crystallise on 1 September 2025 (90 days after due date) at the TT selling rate
B) Bank must crystallise on 1 July 2025 (30 days after due date) at the TT selling rate
C) Bank crystallises only after filing an ECGC claim (after 4 months = 1 October 2025)
D) There is no mandatory crystallisation; bank waits for the buyer to pay in USD
Show answer

Answer: B) Bank must crystallise on 1 July 2025 (30 days after due date) at the TT selling rate

Under FEDAI rules, an unpaid foreign-currency export bill is crystallised into a rupee liability of the exporter on the 30th day after the due date (the next working day if that is a holiday). The bank applies its spot TT selling rate on that date. If the bill is realised later, the bank converts the proceeds at the TT buying rate and settles any difference with the exporter. The ECGC claim is a separate track.

Q48. In a UPAS LC transaction, a German exporter ships goods under a 180-day UPAS LC opened by an Indian bank. A Dutch financing bank pays the German exporter at sight. When does the Indian issuing bank’s payment obligation to the Dutch financing bank arise?

A) At the end of the 180-day usance period
B) Only if the Indian importer fails to repay the Dutch financing bank directly
C) Within 5 banking days of the Dutch bank’s sight payment to the German exporter
D) Immediately when the German exporter presents complying documents (same as a sight LC)
Show answer

Answer: A) At the end of the 180-day usance period

Under a usance-payable-at-sight (UPAS) LC, the beneficiary is paid at sight by a financing bank, while the importer and the issuing bank pay only at the end of the usance period. The Indian issuing bank therefore reimburses the Dutch financing bank at the end of the 180 days.

Q49. Why does an offshore NDF (Non-Deliverable Forward) market develop for the Indian rupee?

A) Because SEBI requires that all forex derivatives on Indian equities be settled offshore to avoid Tobin tax
B) INR has capital account controls, so overseas entities can’t easily hold or deliver it and use USD-settled NDFs instead
C) Because the INR NDF market offers better rates than the onshore market, making it economically attractive for all participants
D) Because RBI prohibits all forex derivative trading in India, forcing participants to use overseas markets
Show answer

Answer: B) INR has capital account controls, so overseas entities can’t easily hold or deliver it and use USD-settled NDFs instead

The rupee is not fully convertible on the capital account, so many non-residents cannot freely use the onshore forward market or hold and deliver rupees abroad. Offshore NDFs let them hedge rupee exposure through contracts settled in dollars on the difference, without delivering rupees.

Q50. An Indian FMCG company has 55% foreign ownership (FDI). It wants to invest ₹300 crore in a new food processing startup in India. How should this investment be classified?

A) Domestic investment — since the investing entity (the Indian FMCG company) is incorporated in India, its investments in India are always domestic
B) FPI — since the ₹300 crore is less than 10% of the startup’s paid-up capital
C) Indirect foreign investment (downstream investment) — the company is owned by non-residents (over 50% foreign holding)
D) ODI — since the FMCG company is investing in another entity, it must comply with the 400% net worth limit
Show answer

Answer: C) Indirect foreign investment (downstream investment) — the company is owned by non-residents (over 50% foreign holding)

Under the FEMA (Non-Debt Instruments) Rules, 2019, an Indian company owned or controlled by non-residents is treated as foreign-owned, and its investment in another Indian company counts as indirect foreign investment (downstream investment). The target company must then meet the FDI conditions for its sector. This stops sectoral caps being sidestepped through Indian holding companies.

How Did You Do?

Every question here is taken from a course chapter, where the topic is covered in full with 15 or so practice questions. If one section cost you more marks than the rest, start your revision there. To see what your basic pay will be after the promotion, try the promotion fitment calculator.

🎯 Scale II → III Promotion Course

Every question on this page comes from the course. Get all 64 chapters, 980+ MCQs and a full-length mock test for the Scale II → III exam.

See the Scale II → III course →

Want to try before you buy? Read free sample chapters — no card needed.

Related

BankersClub Courses

Ready to prepare for your promotion exam?

Structured chapter-by-chapter courses — built by bankers, mapped to the actual promotion syllabus.

Live

Clerk → Scale I

66 chapters · MCQs · exam one-liners

Enrol Now →

Live

Scale I → Scale II

Advanced credit · forex · branch management

Enrol Now →

Live

Scale II → Scale III

Strategic banking · economics · leadership

Enrol Now →

View all promotion courses →

Preparing for Bank Promotion Exam? Enrol Now →